Eerstens `n Stemboodskap waar Hannes Lottering vlug vir die Polisie wat op sy foon wou beslag le.
Die SS bewys dat Hannes dus geweet het hulle soek sy foon vir ondersoek.
Reaon.jpg (117.45 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Reaon 1.jpg (133.96 KiB) Viewed 625 times
STEMBOODSKAP Nadat daar op Meneer Lottering se foon beslag gele is kom hy na vore en berei sy volgelinge voor vir wat kan voorle.
Pono Harassment 1.jpg (118.71 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 2.jpg (134.99 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 3.jpg (127.07 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 4.jpg (136.05 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 5.jpg (142.73 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 6.jpg (128.11 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 7.jpg (130.96 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 8.jpg (123.11 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 9.jpg (123.78 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 10.jpg (134.63 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 11.jpg (129.64 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 12.jpg (122.53 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Pono Harassment 13.jpg (116.76 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Hannes kom weer deur `n vermoedekike `Fake Profiel` en kap verder terug om homself nog dieper in die voet te skiet.
Hannes kap weer terug.jpg (176.17 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Hannes kap weer terug 1.jpg (105.02 KiB) Viewed 625 times
Hannes Lottering jy probeer gate toesteek en skiet jouself alhoe dieper in die voet.
Jy se baie duidelik ONS wat dus jouself insluit aangaande die Porn.
Verder kan en MAG `n Reservis OP GEEN MANIER VAN DIENS by Polisiewerk betrokke raak nie tensy `n Noodgeval waar hy die Stasie moet kontak en homself aan Diens moet laat boek in die VB.
As hulle jou dus gehelp het met ondersoekwerk was dit slegs as PELLE en dus net so skuldig soos jy.
`n Ekspert is elkgeval op `n Spesiale vlak en moet elke Jaar of 2 Jaar `n opknappings-kurses doen op daardie GEBIED en sterkte want eers se jy dit kan nie gebruik word nie en dan kan dit weer.
Clup 720 Leoni Porn.jpg (132.05 KiB) Viewed 625 times
**FAIR USE**
Fair use Copyright Disclaimer under the South African Copyright Act, allowance is made for “fair use”
for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is not an infringement of copyright.
This channel is for educational purposes only!!
All my content is / was found on the public domain.
I follow the fair use dealings and fair use guidelines with my opinions and news that I report
to my subscribers about the topic of Gert van Rooyen Investigation.
Fair use permits a party to use a copyrighted work without the
copyright owner's permission for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.[/size][/b]
Op Vrydag 26 Augustus 2022 om 9:10 PM maak Hannes Lottering `n Live dat die SAP sy FOON SOEK EN HULLE HET `n LASBRIEF OM SY HUIS TE DEURSOEK, HY PAK EN VLUG 200Km terwyl hy in dieselfde asem se dat hy NIE `n PROBLEEM HET OM SY FOON TE GEE VIR FORENSIESE ONDERSOEK NIE.
Hoekom dan VLUG Lottering. HOEKOM DAN VLUG
Op Woensdag 31 Augustus 2022 om 5:57 PM VYF (5) DAE LATER is Hannes weer Live en weereens BEVESTIG HY DAT HY WEET DIE SAP SOEK SY FOON EN HY IS WEEREENS BEREID OM DIE APARAAT VRYWILLIG IN TE GEE...
Hoekom het hy dit nie gedoen nie, HOEKOM NIE.
Let veral op hoe sy GESIG EN ALGEHELE VOORKOMS VEROUDERT HET oor `n TYDPERK VAN VYF (5) DAE, dalkies die oorsaak van SENUWEE WAT HOM OPVREET.
Op 28 September 2022 om 11:58 PM maak Hannes die SKOKKENDE POS DAT SY FOON GEKONFISKEER IS EN MAAK HY SEKERE BEKENTENISSE RONDOM KINDER PORNOGRAFIE, SELFS DAT HY GEWEET HET SY FOON WORD JUIS DEUR DIE SAP DAARVOOR GESOEK SOOS OP SKERMSKOOT IN HIERDIE VIDEO.
`n Bom bom ontplof basies nou rondom die foon Sage, so erg dat Lottering selfs die volgende Dag Foto`s plaas van hoe sy TIETTIES GEKRAP is, maak `n AANRANDING SAAK oop teen die SAP Lid en kry selfs `n HOFBEVEL teen die Lid.
NOU
Basies `n MAAND nadat Lottering die TOEBEHORE VRYWILLIG sou INHANDIG het hy dit NIE GEDOEN nie en die GROOTSTE VRAAG WEEREENS... HOEKOM NIE DIE FOON INGEHANDIG NIE EN HOEKOM HET JY IN DIE EERSTE PLEK GEVLUG LOTTERING. HOEKOM
HOEKOM
HOEKOM
Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 11:58 PM
During my trail of the harassment case at Pretoria Central, I appeared as required.
And lo and behold, the disappearing docket made a miraculous appearance. ( you all know of the docket that disappears for two months and then miraculously appears again?)
The very same docket that disappears and then reappeares periodically from time to time..
I need to state categorically that there is only one docket.
The fallacy being put forward by my " learned " friend that there is more than one docket ( in fact four or five dockets) is just that: a fallacy.
I also need to reiterate that MrX is not a party to the harassment case as he is not a complainant.
At best, he might be called upon as a witness.
Now that the disapearing docket appeared again, it would enable my legal team to scrutinise, in open court, all the alleged " evidence ".
( Which was what I wanted all along).
The content of the docket makes for very interesting reading. You might want to follow proceedings.
After one makes a case against someone the investigation officer has to execute a warning statement by requesting the perpetrator to make a warning statement.
I was only requested to make a single warning statement sometime in April this year ( which I did)
Therefore, there is only one case where I allegedly transgressed a court order.
My attorney asked for full disclosure of the single docket to enable my legal team to study the content of the docket to enable us to prepare our defence.
We should have full disclosure of the docket within the next two or three days.
However, we intend making an application to court to expedite disclosure of the docket tomorrow morning.
After my attorney established a date for the postponement of the court date to 12 October, and the date was accepted by the magistrate, my attorney requested permission from the magistrate to be excused.
Upon the request being granted, my attorney excused himself and I left the dock at the same time.
The investigating officer, Detective sergeant Masongo then attacked me by forcing me out of court into a holding cell.
The door of the holding cell was kept open for this purpose.
Sergeant Masongo then proceeded to grab my phone from my shirt pocket.
I grabbed my phone and held onto it.
A scuffle broke out and I then requested Sergeant Masongo to show me the section 205 warrant giving him permission to take possession of my phone.
He waved a piece of paper allegedly being the warrant in the air.
I thereupon requested in the presence of my attorney( still in the holding cell) to read the alleged section 205 warrant.
Sergeant Masongo failed to show either myself or my attorney the warrant.
We wanted to determine if the document being waved about was indeed a section 205 warrant with the correct dates.
This was refused.
Sergeant Masongo then proceeded to exit the holding cell on the other side.
That cell door was then locked to prevent us from following Sergeant Masongo to the prisoner cells in the basement.
My attorney and I then left the court and went down the stairs to the cells in the basement.
It needs to be mentioned that the court was still in session with the magistrate on the bench whilst this commotion was occurring.
When my attorney and I reached the court cells in the basement we found Sergeant Masongo on the other side of a locked gate ( which we could not enter)
My attorney then called Sergeant Masongo to furnish proof of the section 205 warrant to take possession of my cellphone. He refused to heed our request.
At the same time I requested Sergeant Masongo for a receipt for my phone and was informed that it would be furnished at Hercules police station.
Due to the fact that my attorney had another pressing matter to attend to we then decided to meet at Hercules police station at four yesterday afternoon.
Sergeant Masongo ( he was sitting outside the station in a car) refused to acknowledge us or to give us any co-operation and we then requested to see the station commander. Unfortunately the station commander was not available as she had left for home
I then made a case of theft and assault against Sergeant Masongo ( assisted by my attorney)
We received the Cas number depicted below late last night.
It was decided to meet with the Station commander this morning at 8:30 to fill her in on the events that transpired at court.
We then indeed had a very fruitfull discussion with the Station commander which would result in an internal investigation into the conduct of Sergeant Masongo at court.
I do not wish to elaborate on any additional steps we will be taking except that we might have to approach the High court to urgently intervene.
We will also aplly for a harrasment order against Segeant Masongo in the Magistrate court in Pretoria tomorrow.
The reason Sergeant Masonga desperately needs to take possession of my phone is to determine if there is underage pornographic videos of a certain
Mrs. X engaging in prostitution at Club 920.
During our investigation pertaining a harassment case for our defense, 7 Terrabite of video material of an underage female child came into our possession.
We used facial recognition to determine in which sections of the videos Mrs. X appears.
The IT people that scrutinized the videos with Facial recognition soon realized that it was indeed child porn and therefore could not be used in a court of law.
Being police reservists they then decided to hand said underage child porn over to the relevant authorities to enable police to find the perpetrators to enable police to prosecute them.
Apparently the men involved were Indian, Black and European.
I want to state categorically that I have not seen the Club 920 underage porn videos of Mrs.X, I never had said porn and it was never given to me by any electronic means.
I also wish to state that in my attorneys opinion, my cellphone was illegally confiscated by Sergeant Masongo and that there was a breach of the chain of evidence regarding the handling of my phone as it was illegally stolen and any compromising evidence can as such not be used in a court of law.
( But I need to mention here that nothing was removed by me from my phone simply because I do not have any incriminating evidence that can be used against me on my phone)
In any event, if I had any compromising evidence on my phone it can easily be recovered by any half decent IT guy.
I also wish to make it known that I have biometric (fingerprint) , PIN and facial recognition on my phone as security features.
( and having been in court, as a law abiding citizen, naturally my phone was switched off)
I know it is not impossible to bypass all the security features, but good luck accessing the information on my phone.
You guys are going to be busy indeed.
If I do not see a proper and valid section 205 warrant with the correct dates, you guys are not getting the phone unlocked.
Meanwhile, we are all on the merry go round.
Enjoy the victory of having stolen my phone while it lasts.
I can assure you that we are not impressed.
But that, you guys will find out from tomorrow onwards.
Enjoy the following few days.
Message from SAPS. HERCULES ref nr CAS 391/9/2022 was transferred to PRETORIA CENTRAL station contact details: 012-3534000. Details of the new case number will follow soon. Do NOT reply to this SMS.
**FAIR USE**
Fair use Copyright Disclaimer under the South African Copyright Act, allowance is made for “fair use”
for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is not an infringement of copyright.
This channel is for educational purposes only!!
All my content is / was found on the public domain.
I follow the fair use dealings and fair use guidelines with my opinions and news that I report
to my subscribers about the topic of Gert van Rooyen Investigation.
Fair use permits a party to use a copyrighted work without the
copyright owner's permission for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.[/size][/b]
Genade en daar kom die Tannie se wiele nou heeltemal af na verskriklike dreigemente / Intimidasie rondom vrae wat gevra was oor sy pos rakende kinderpornografie.
Hierdie pos is egter nou `n bewys dat daar rede tot kommer is rondom Hannes Lottering en kinderpornografie.
Nogals daaroor gespog ook.
In besir van Porn.jpg (441.5 KiB) Viewed 544 times
**FAIR USE**
Fair use Copyright Disclaimer under the South African Copyright Act, allowance is made for “fair use”
for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is not an infringement of copyright.
This channel is for educational purposes only!!
All my content is / was found on the public domain.
I follow the fair use dealings and fair use guidelines with my opinions and news that I report
to my subscribers about the topic of Gert van Rooyen Investigation.
Fair use permits a party to use a copyrighted work without the
copyright owner's permission for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.[/size][/b]